Social media platform X (previously Twitter) announced measures on Thursday to fight the unfold of unlawful content material and disinformation on its platform, together with the elimination of tons of of Hamas-affiliated accounts. X’s actions comply with current criticism from Europe’s prime tech regulator, Thierry Breton, the Inner Market Commissioner of the European Fee.
The corporate’s response got here within the type of an open letter addressed to the European Fee, particularly directed to Commissioner Thierry Breton, acknowledging the gravity of the state of affairs and the platform’s accountability in offering correct, real-time info to its customers.
X informed Breton that it has eliminated and labeled posts, pictures, and articles in regards to the battle which have been flagged as doubtlessly containing disinformation or violating the platform’s content material insurance policies. Furthermore, the platform emphasised its dedication to working carefully with legislation enforcement companies to deal with points associated to unlawful content material. It highlighted its responsiveness to requests from authorities, significantly from the European Union, to promptly take away problematic content material.
Thierry Breton had earlier raised concerns about X’s function in enabling the unfold of unlawful content material and disinformation throughout the European Union. In an open letter posted on the platform, Breton pointed to the terrorist assaults carried out by Hamas in opposition to Israel. He emphasised that the Digital Services Act (DSA) imposes particular obligations concerning content material moderation on platforms and referred to as on X to implement efficient mitigation measures.
The DSA, which was passed in 2022, serves as a regulatory framework aimed toward safeguarding human rights and limiting the unfold of unlawful content material on-line. It establishes a complete set of obligations for digital companies to guard customers, guarantee basic rights on-line, and promote transparency and accountability throughout on-line platforms throughout the European Union.
Nonetheless, Breton’s actions have raised concerns about political overreach. Critics argue that giving enforcement powers to a political fee is perhaps used to drive platforms to take actions they don’t seem to be obligated to carry out. Jan Penfrat, a senior coverage adviser on the Brussels-based digital rights group EDRi, expressed these considerations, suggesting that such actions may undermine the rules of freedom of expression and digital rights.