A Norwegian court docket on Monday started hearing a lawsuit introduced by Fjotolf Hansen, beforehand often called Anders Behring Breivik, over his jail circumstances, in response to native media. Breivik sought to sue the Norwegian Ministry of Justice, alleging that the jail circumstances imposed on him violated his human rights.
Hansen set off a automotive bomb in Oslo’s authorities quarter and attacked a political youth camp in 2011, killing 77 and wounding 42. After Hansen was convicted on homicide and terrorism fees, the Oslo District Court docket sentenced Hansen to a extendable 21-year interval of preventive detention, citing the chance of a repeat offence as a purpose during the sentence, as Hansen at trial prompt he wish to destroy Norway’s democracy. Moreover, the defendant additionally prompt that he needs to proceed his political battle behind the jail partitions. Consequently, the Metropolis Court docket determined a solitary confinement at a most safety division.
On Monday, the lawyer representing Hansen emphasised that he didn’t search the court docket to grant a shorter sentence, regardless that Hansen’s sentence will be prolonged if the court docket believes that he nonetheless poses a risk to public security. Nonetheless, Hansen’s lawyer argued that the present jail circumstances are too strict, with too little regular human contact. Counsel stated this violates Hansen’s human rights as a result of Hansen may solely meet jail officers, his psychologist and some chosen inmates. The jail circumstances imposed on Hansen allegedly contributed to a number of suicidal makes an attempt in 2018 and 2020.
Alternatively, the state lawyer argued that the circumstances are “not near reaching the brink for human rights violations.” The lawyer acknowledged that solitary confinement is critical as a result of Hansen continues to be happy with what he has achieved. Aside from the solitary confinement, Hansen has three usually furnished cells, which give him entry to bodily train, a bathroom, bathe, fridge, online game console and different types of leisure.
Beforehand, in 2016, Hansen brought the same lawsuit to the European Court docket of Justice (ECJ), looking for to problem the jail circumstances, together with his solitary confinement, his subjection to physique searches, the management over his correspondence and the failure to have in mind his psychological vulnerability. Hansen argued the circumstances constituted a breach of Articles 3 and eight of the European Convention on Human Rights. The articles present for the prohibition of torture and the best to respect for his non-public life. The ECJ dominated towards him, stating that the appliance was “manifestly ill-founded” and that the Norwegian home authorities and courts had acted moderately to steadiness society’s pursuits and Hansen’s rights.