A 3-judge panel in Alabama chose a brand new congressional district map on Thursday in response to a lawsuit arguing that the Alabama legislature’s congressional map was racially gerrymandered. The choice comes only some weeks after the US Supreme Court docket rejected a petition from the state authorities, which sought to attraction a court docket order prohibiting the usage of gerrymandered congressional maps in Alabama elections.
In September, the federal court docket overseeing the case appointed a particular grasp to solicit plans and feedback from the events within the case and the general public. After this, the particular grasp supplied three remedial plans to exchange the unique, gerrymandered plan the court docket enjoined. After the court docket held hearings on the plans, it discovered that “Remedial Plan 3” glad “all constitutional and statutory necessities.” The court docket famous that Remedial Plan 3 “Utterly Cures the Vote Dilution We Discovered Whereas Finest Preserving the State’s Legislative Preferences Expressed By the 2023 Plan.” The brand new map is connected to the court docket order as “Exhibit A.”
The court docket ordered the Alabama Secretary of State to manage Alabama’s upcoming upcoming congressional elections based on Remedial Plan 3. In response to right this moment’s resolution, Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen stated:
The Workplace of the Secretary of State will facilitate the 2024 election cycle in accordance with the map the federal court docket has compelled upon Alabama and ordered us to make use of. It will be significant for all Alabamians to know that the authorized portion of this course of has not but been accomplished. A full listening to on the redistricting difficulty will happen sooner or later and I belief Lawyer Normal Marshall to characterize Alabama by that course of. Within the meantime, I’ll hold our state’s elections protected, safe and clear as a result of that’s what I used to be elected to do.
The case, Allen v. Milligan, first started in November 2021. The plaintiffs claimed the Alabama legislature drew the state’s congressional maps in a approach that racially gerrymandered. In June, after the district court docket enjoined the Alabama Secretary of State from utilizing the unique map, the case made its solution to the US Supreme Court docket. There, the court docket discovered that the plaintiffs had been prone to succeed and that Alabama’s proposed map probably violated Part Two of the Voting Rights Act. In September, the US Supreme Court docket additionally denied Alabama’s attraction of a court docket order prohibiting elections with gerrymandered congressional maps.